Zero-Achievers Non-Progressing Studies in Finnish Open University: Three Preventive Factors
Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science,
Current education policy responds to changes and needs in working life by guiding individuals at different stages of working careers to develop their skills in the spirit of lifelong learning. More and more are applying with hope and enthusiasm to the Open University to strengthen their competence but are unable to get their studies completed. The article explores factors related to the non-progression of studies by students at the Open University in Finland. We call non-progressing students zero-achievers who enroll in studies but do not complete a single credit during the period of course. This research is a descriptive mixed methods study. The research data was collected by an online survey sent to 414 of one Open University zero-achiever students and 185 responses were received. The qualitative data was analysed through the means of content analysis and the quantitative data was examined through percentages and averages. The data was analysed comprehensively combining the quantitative and qualitative data by themes according to the three main factors for the non-progression of studies. The Open University student explained their non-progression in studies by three preventive factors: difficulties in reconciling areas of life, lack of generic skills, and passivity in seeking guidance. The purpose of this research is to raise zero-achievement as a phenomenon at a time marked by the ideal of high performance, the ideology of lifelong learning and the digitalization and massification of higher education. Alongside the ideal of efficiency, a wide range of students must be remembered in educational systems. The research contributes important new knowledge to education policy, to academic community and for university students to identify and avoid preventive factors for the progression of studies. Based on the research, the construction of shared understanding about above aspects is recommended to reach common goals.
- Open University
- education policy
- generic skills
How to Cite
Lauder H, Mayhew K. Higher education and the labour market: an introduction. Oxford Review of Education. 2020;46(1): 1-9.
Isopahkala-Bouret. Troublesome access. Non-admission experiences in a competitive Finnish higher education. Social Sciences. 2019;8(11):302.
Moitus S, Weimer L, Välimaa J. Flexible learning pathways in higher education. Finland’s country case study for the UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP-UNESCO) SDG4 project in 2018–2021; 2020.
Joutsen H, Kuivalainen T, Haltia N, Lahtomaa M, Patja P, Krapu J, Ellfolk E K, Kekäläinen U, Savela P, Vuori S. From a limited option to an established admissions method. Ideas for Developing the Open University Path. Jyväskylä Open University web-publications 12.2021.
Ministry of Education and Culture. Vision for higher education and research in 2030. 2017.
Haltia N, Isopahkala-Bouret U, Jauhiainen A. The vocational route to higher education in Finland: Students’ backgrounds, choices and study experiences. European Educational Research Journal;2021.
Vipunen. Education statistics Finland. Participants and credits in open university education; 2021.
OECD. Continuous Learning in Working Life in Finland. Getting Skills Right. OECD Publishing, Paris; 2020. DOI:.org/10.1787/2ffcffe6-en.
Tight M. Twenty-first century skills: meaning, usage and value, European Journal of Higher Education. 2021;11(2): 160-174.
Bowl M. Diversity and Differentiation, Equity and Equality in a Marketised Higher Education System. In M Bowl, C McCaig, J Hughes, editors. Equality and Differentiation in Marketised Higher Education. Palgrave Studies in Excellence and Equity in Global Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham; 2018.
Laalo H, Kinnari H, Silvennoinen H. Setting New Standards for Homo Academicus: Entrepreneurial University Graduates on the EU Agenda. European Education. 2020;51(2):93–110.
Siivonen P, Filander K. Non-traditional and ‘traditional’ students at a regional Finnish University: demanding customers and school pupils in need of support. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2020;39(3):247–262.
Bunce L, Baird A, Jones E-S. The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance. Studies in Higher Education. 2016;42(11):1958–1978.
Siivonen P. Who Is to Be Positioned as Employable? Adult Graduates’ Educational and Working Life Pathways. In: M Tomlinson, L Holmes, editors. Graduate Employability in Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London;2017.
Andrade C, Fernandes J L. Role boundary management during Covid-19 pandemic A qualitative analysis of focus group data with working-student mothers. PSICOLOGIA. 2021;35(1):157–162.
Cinamon RG. Integrating Work and Study Among Young Adults: Testing an Empirical Model. Journal of Career Assessment. 2016;24(3):527-542.
Creed P, French J, Hood M. Working while studying at university: The relationship between work benefits and demands and engagement and well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2015;86:48-57. DOI:.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.002
van Rhijn TM, Lero DS. The influence of self-efficacy beliefs for student parents attending university. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2014;33(4):541–555.
Mullins L. Management and organisational behaviour. 11th edition. Financial Times Prentice Hall - Harlow; 2017.
Kremer I. The relationship between school-work-family-conflict, subjective stress, and burnout. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2016;31(4):805–819.
Riggert S C, Boyle M, Petrosko J M, Ash D, Rude-Parkins C. Student Employment and Higher Education: Empiricism and Contradiction. Review of Educational Research. 2016;76(1):63-92. DOI:.org/10.3102/00346543076001063
Waterhouse P, Samra R, Lucassen M. Mental distress and its relationship to distance education students´ work and family roles. Distance Education. 2020;41(4):540–558.
Stone C, O’Shea S. Time, money, leisure and guilt: The gendered challenges of higher education for mature-age students. Australian Journal of Adult Learning. 2013;53(1):95–116.
Wimpenny K, Savin-Baden M. Alienation, agency and authenticity: a synthesis of the literature on student engagement, Teaching in Higher Education. 2013;18(3):311-326.
Samra R, Waterhouse P, Lucassen M. Combining and managing work-family-study roles and perceptions of institutional support. Distance Education 2021;42(1):88–105.
Ketonen E, Malmberg L E, Salmela-Aro K, Muukkonen H, Tuominen H, Lonka K. The role of study engagement in university students' daily experiences: A multilevel test of moderation. Learning and Individual Differences. 2019;69:196-205.
Salmela-Aro K, Read S. Study engagement and burnout profiles among Finnish higher education students. Burnout Research. 2017;7:21-28.
Muir T, Milthorpe N, Stone C, Dyment J, Freeman E, Hopwood B. Chronicling engagement: students’ experience of online learning over time. Distance Education. 2019;40(2):262-277.
EU. The European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (EQF). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities;2008.
EU. Key competences for lifelong learning. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union;2019.
Davidson C. The New Education: How to Revolutionize the University to Prepare Students for a World in Flux. New York: Basic Books; 2017.
Finnish National Agency for Education. The competences and skills in 2035 - The first results of the national forum for skills anticipation’s anticipation work. Reports and Reviews 2019:3. Grano Oy.
Uljens M, Rajakaltio H. National Curriculum Development as Educational Leadership: A Discursive and Non-affirmative Approach. In: M Uljens, R Ylimäki, editors. Bridging Educational Leadership, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik - Non-Affirmative Theory of Education. 2017;411–437.
OECD. Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris; 2021.
Hyytinen H, Toom A, Postareff L. Unraveling the complex relationship in critical thinking, approaches to learning and self-efficacy beliefs among first-year educational science students. Learning and Individual Differences. 2018;67:132–142.
Ursin J, Hyytinen H, Silvennoinen K. Korkeakouluopiskelijoiden geneeristen taitojen arviointi – Kappas!-hankkeen tuloksia. Ministry of Education and Culture; 2021.
Virtanen A, Tynjälä P. Factors explaining the learning of generic skills: a study of university students’ experiences. Teaching in Higher Education. 2019;24(7):880-894.
Bauer S, Ratinen I, Kumpulainen K, Kyrö-Ämmälä O, Nikander L, Väänänen I. Agency, expertise and working life skills: Students’ conceptions of the generic competences required in the world of work. European Journal of Education Studies. 2021;8(5):26-54.
Moitus S, Vuorinen R. Evaluation of Guidance Services in Higher Education in Finland. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance. 2003;3(3):159–175.
Skaniakos T, Honkimäki S, Kallio E, Nissinen K, Tynjälä P. Study guidance experiences, study progress, and perceived learning outcomes of Finnish university students. European Journal of Higher Education. 2018;9(2):203–218.
Smith C, Allen J. Essential functions of academic advising: What students want and get. NACADA Journal. 2006;26(1):56–66.
Jensen D, Jetten J. Bridging, and bonding interactions in higher education: Social capital and students’ academic and professional identity formation. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6:126–126. DOI:.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00126
Siivonen P. Becoming an educable lifelong learning subject: adult graduates’ transitions in education and working life. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 2016;35(1):36–50.
Honkimäki S, Tynjälä P. Study Orientations in Different Tutoring Environments: University Language Students’ First two Years. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. 2007;15(2):183–199.
Hoffman D M, Välimaa J, Huusko M. The Bologna Process in Academic Basic Units: Finnish Universities and Competitive Horizons. In: J Välimaa, O-H Ylijoki, editors. Cultural Perspectives on Higher Education, 227–243. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.
Bedenlier S, Bond M, Buntins K, Zawacki-Richter O, Kerres M. Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2021;36(4):126–150.
Welch P. Mass Higher Education in England—a Success Story? Postdigit Sci Educ 2021;3:48–64.
Kauppila A, Kinnari H, Niemi A M. Governmentality of disability in the context of lifelong learning in European Union policy. Critical Studies in Education. 2020;61(5):529–544.
Simmons O S. Lost in transition: the implications of social capital for higher education access. Notre Dame L Law Rev. 2011;87:205–252.
Vuorinen R, Kasurinen H, Sampson J. Implementation strategies for guidance policy and practice in higher education. In: R Vuorinen, S Saukkonen, editors. Guidance Services in Higher Education. Strategies, Design and Implementation. University of Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research;2006.
Abstract View: 489 times
PDF Download: 156 times